Under the surface of our technological dystopian takeover, there are forces that the architects of the chaos can’t understand, and that will undo all of their designs. The most immediate among these threats is the rising anger among the masses, who are increasingly being pushed to the status of neo-nomads—of de-classed workers with no clear direction as employment options shrink, and life becomes unaffordable. Inevitably these cast-outs will revolt against the system, and forge a new civilizational path. This is something that our class enemies are worried about, but the driving motivation behind this revolutionary spirit can’t truly be comprehended by the enemy.
The dedicated agents of Zionism and anti-communism assign cynical intentions to the world’s popular resistance movements, imagining “antisemitism,” envy, or some other scapegoat for why they encounter this resistance. This revolutionary wave that’s sweeping today’s world, and striking blows at the hegemon from Yemen to Palestine to France, has a nature that can’t be reduced to any base summary of a desire. What compels the uprising’s participants is the mandate of history, or of heaven—the objective need to act in the face of that which can’t be allowed.
When we understand that this is what gives strength to our own cause, we become able to properly do our duty as organizers. The people won’t join our cause because we’ve appealed to them through culture war grievances, which the bulk of the masses have now become deeply tired of. They’ll join us because we’ve proven ourselves capable of leading them to victory, with our biggest task in this regard being to take the helm of organized labor. All of today’s successful revolutionary movements, from Ansarallah to Palestine’s resisters to the Sandinistas, recognized this before they took on a mass leadership role. They see how an exploited people will only follow you when you’ve fulfilled their objective needs.
That the foes of the global working class fail to see this makes them arrogant in a way which will be their undoing; why do you think the Zionist occupiers and their Washington backers couldn’t anticipate October 7’s Al-Aqsa Flood operation? The Palestinian resistance didn’t just have the advantage of tactical intelligence and discipline when it caught the occupier by surprise; it was able to exploit the hubris that makes the enemy genuinely believe those who it brutalizes have no right to hit back, and only fight because of hollow ideology.
The other variable that endangers the enemy’s designs—this being the blackouts that will come from AI electrical grid overload—is a byproduct of a system that’s become truly cybernetic. The different wings of our ruling class may disagree on whether to accelerate AI, but the nature of today’s driving economic forces makes it so that a runaway tech scenario was always unavoidable. It’s just a question of how soon the infrastructure will fall apart under its own weight. Our task is to make sure the people are well-organized enough that when a larger collapse happens, the working-class movement will have the means to replace official support systems that have utterly failed. This will be a critical part of what precedes the overthrow of our tyrannical militarized police state, and the rejuvenation of our civilization.
The system has long been preparing for such an advanced stage in the class war, subjecting the masses to a controlled destabilization where their safety and security are taken away; but the logical conclusion of this is for the existing social order to be supplanted by a new one, because the whole basis for the old order goes away when you change too much. This is the process identified by Hegel, who observed how incremental changes add up to a fundamental shift that suddenly overtakes all that preceded it:
It is said, natura non facit saltum [there are no leaps in nature]; and ordinary thinking when it has to grasp a coming-to-be or a ceasing-to-be, fancies it has done so by representing it as a gradual emergence or disappearance. But we have seen that the alterations of being in general are not only the transition of one magnitude into another, but a transition from quality into quantity and vice versa, a becoming-other which is an interruption of gradualness and the production of something qualitatively different from the reality which preceded it. Water, in cooling, does not gradually harden as if it thickened like porridge, gradually solidifying until it reached the consistency of ice; it suddenly solidifies, all at once. It can remain quite fluid even at freezing point if it is standing undisturbed, and then a slight shock will bring it into the solid state.
The liberal wing of the ruling class, now headed for a takeover after the midterms, seeks to bypass this law of nature by putting guardrails on the tech upheaval. The Dark Enlightenment movement believes the best response is to fully embrace the destruction of our economy and social support systems, and simply make the masses Palestinianized. Both tendencies are continuing the futile quest to resolve capital’s contradictions through internal fixes, as described by Edgar Hardcastle in his refutation of the technocratic ideology:
Capitalism plunges into periodic crises of “overproduction” and exhibits its permanent contradictions of extreme wealth and extreme poverty not because of machines or the lack of them, or because of high or low productivity, but because the means of production and distribution, including the machines, are privately owned and controlled by the capitalist class. The remedy (vaguely glimpsed by some of the technocrats) is to make the means of life the common property of society and have goods produced solely for use instead of for sale and profit-making. The method (and this the technocrats entirely ignore) is the capture of political power by an organised Socialist majority.
One word in conclusion. It is obvious that the technocrats know nothing of the studies made by Marx. (They actually reject him as obsolete because they imagine that he advocated the continuance of the money system whereas in fact he recognised, as does every Socialist, that the money system will pass away with the passing of capitalism.) Marx's approach to this problem was really scientific and contrasts strikingly with the haphazard methods and hampering prejudices of these American engineers.
This has to do with the broader error made by the anti-communists, which is to view Marxism as a concrete ideological dogma. Technocracy, Dark Enlightenment, and every other crackpot doctrine created by the bourgeoisie’s intellectuals has the purpose of imitating what Marxism does. Each of them poorly mimic dialectical materialism, and they all fail, because they’re never willing to give up the idealist view of how history works. Their nonsense will be swept away by the historical mandate before us, which the neo-nomads know they have no choice but to respond to.
The members of the Laura Loomer mercenary gang, driven by a twisted doctrine that seeks war against humanity, believe that we must be motivated by the same perversions they are. The reality they can’t face is that the forces which will defeat them come from inescapable laws of the cosmos, completely independent of ideological constraints. The economic mode that created their pedocratic Zionist power structure is now engineering its own demise, and carrying out the automation revolution that will bring the end of class society. The ones the system is leaving behind will dislodge the Satanic regime, unleashing the immeasurable new productive forces that the AI upheaval is creating.
————————————————————————
If you appreciate my work, I hope you become a one-time or regular donor to my Patreon account. Like most of us, I’m feeling the economic pressures from our era of accelerating inflation, and I need money to keep fighting for a new system that works for all of us. Go to my Patreon here.
To keep this platform effective amid the censorship against dissenting voices, join my Telegram channel.
No comments:
Post a Comment