China will inspire a new wave of revolutions, if we free Marxism from its ideological prison

For the revolutionary forces to rebound after their recent retreats, we must defeat the forces that seek to keep Marxism trapped in an ideological prison. That want Marxism-Leninism to not be an actual science, able to respond towards fluid history, but a stagnant monolith that only reenacts the past.

This is the attitude towards Marxism that the KKE has put forth in relation to China, as well as to numerous other things. China is the example that I’m focusing on here because of its relevance to the present moment, where Cuba’s government has been forced into enacting free market reforms. In the discourse over these reforms, the KKE plays an underhanded role; because the KKE has been rallying behind Cuba’s revolution, yet it's made clear that it views reforms like these ones as being the destruction of socialism. In reality, they are a defensive measure in the face of genocide. A measure that may succeed or fail to achieve the growth it’s intended to bring, but that cannot be confused with proof of socialism’s demise.

As we see Cuba use markets to navigate its dire circumstances, we must keep in mind that the pivotal question is whether these markets can successfully build up the country’s productive forces. If they can’t then this will create a bigger setback, but the Cuban workers state is still fundamentally in control of the economy. The underlying structure has not changed, there is still a proletariat dictatorship that subordinates business. Therefore the question is whether this state has been set on a path to collapse of integrity, like the Soviet state was. Which is a danger that should never be dismissed, but the dogma of the KKE tells us to automatically assume this has happened. 

This comes through in its analysis on China from 2011, which concluded the Deng reforms represent corruption based on how these reforms are distinct from Lenin’s New Economic Policy:

The reality in China is entirely different from that of the USSR during the NEP. In China: a. There is no monopoly in foreign trade. Thousands of foreign companies that operate in China cover the largest proportion of the Chinese exports, which of course are dependent on their plans, based on their profitability and not on a centrally planned economy. b. 440 private foreign banks operate in China, and they have acquired at least 10% of the shares of the Chinese state banks and since 2005 there has developed a domestic private banking sector.[61] c. An important percentage of industry is private or privatized (in the form of stock companies), while the private sector is estimated to produce 70% of the GDP. d. Chinese legislation, especially in the economic and commercial sector, is fully harmonized, thanks to the assistance of the WTO, to the norms of the global capitalist economy.

The analysis then predicts that “the dominance of capitalist relations in China, which is a fact today, slowly or quickly, will lead to a bigger compliance of the political system, the dominant ideology and all the elements of the superstructure whose capitalist character will be reflected in its symbols. The intensification of class contradictions will ripen and so will the need for the revolutionary labour movement to be represented by its own party against capitalist power.”

Take note of the solution the KKE presents: create a new party that can overtake the CPC, which is a project that would inevitably require overthrowing the government itself given the nature of China’s system. The answer to these real or alleged problems is not internal struggle within the CPC, which Mao has already provided a model for doing; it’s an insurgency that the imperialists could easily infiltrate and exploit. This reflects the seriousness of the central argument itself.

To support the “China sold out to the west” narrative, the KKE points to the ways that China’s economy differs from the Soviet economy from a century earlier. That these conditions greatly differ is a given. Yet how superficially different they are is not the pivotal issue; all of the areas that the KKE addresses here are tangential to whether the workers are in power within China, because capitalism does not equal markets or money. It also doesn’t necessarily equal the presence of individual capitalists, not if these capitalists exist under proletarian rule.

Since capitalism’s transition to its monopoly stage, capitalism has at its core been about financial control; when a country has broken free from banking rule, and its state has the structure of workers democracy, it is socialist. This is why we should treat these critiques about China’s incorporation of banks and private business as superficial: it ignores the question of which class is in control.

As for the KKE’s predictions of escalating class conflict in China, the PRC has indeed experienced new crises since 2011, but the outcome has not been a weakening of the CPC’s position among the working masses. The CPC has responded to the needs of the masses by enacting unprecedented crackdowns on the billionaires, who’ve gotten far poorer while the workers have continued to be lifted up by China’s economic ascension.

Socialism has been strengthened by everything that’s happened since the Deng reforms, rather than being destroyed by them like the KKE expected. This is what comes from rejecting stagnant dogmatism, like Deng said China needed to do. He talked of how the CPC follows

a fairly important principle, generalized by Comrade Mao Zedong, that is, in order to formulate correct strategies and tactics and achieve victory in revolution, a party must integrate the universal truth of Marxism-Leninism with the revolutionary practice and actual conditions in its own country.

Our experience consists of formulating and carrying out correct strategies and tactics in the light of our country’s specific conditions and, in particular, on the basis of profound understanding of the conditions of classes and the class struggle. Shortly after its founding, our Party clearly recognized that Chinese society was a semi-colonial and semi-feudal one. With this nature of our society in mind, our Party determined the stages, targets and motive forces of the revolution, and decided that opposing imperialism and feudalism was our revolutionary task in the first stage. But, can we say that by presenting this task we have truly understood the meaning of the struggle against imperialism and feudalism? No! We cannot say this, because it is no easy job to formulate and implement correct strategies and tactics for such a struggle. Over a fairly long period of time in this revolutionary stage our Party was unable to settle or straighten out such questions as how to fight against imperialism and feudalism, what forces we should rely on, what forces we should unite with, and what forces we should attack.

When George Soros has constructed his insipid narrative about China—where Deng Xiaoping is portrayed as the pro-“capitalist” who opposed Leninism and whose policies must be restored—he’s drawing from an entirely superficial view of history. A view that looks purely at the surface-level characteristics of something, rather than at the actual objective role it plays within the class struggle.

This is the logic that the dogmatic opportunists within Marxism are operating on, and it assists the designs of actors like Soros. The next victories that our cause wins will come from those who’ve broken free from the box which they’ve placed Marxism into, and applied Mao’s practice of truly investigating the historical conditions.

The root error of western Marxism was to believe that dialectical materialism means a series of rote-copied doctrines, confined to the framework of a predetermined and unchanging ideology. This is a way of thinking that fails to see the inherent motion within history, and therefore breeds complacency. In organizational terms, such thinking looks like neglect towards the education of the organization’s ranks, letting the members conclude that they understand the meaning of something even though they’ve cut their investigations short. You need to be constantly investigating your reality, or your revolutionary project will be set on the path to its demise. 

This is why the Soviet communist party couldn’t survive, while the CPC has only grown more vital. After Stalin’s death, the opportunistic Khrushchevite faction took advantage of the weaknesses in educational rigor, and undermined the dictatorship of the proletariat as part of its “de-Stalinization” campaign. This is a reality that the KKE obscures, because the KKE fundamentally shares the dogmatic opportunist views which Khrushchev propagated. In the KKE’s view, the path to socialism’s destruction didn’t begin with “de-Stalinization,” but with Gorbachev forty years later. The events that led to the Gorbachev period are ignored, in favor of an ahistorical fetishization of the USSR’s system prior to when it fell apart.

This is exactly the kind of anti-dialectical thinking that Mao sought to combat, and Deng successfully rescued China from such errors. Now Cuba is utilizing the same type of intelligence. It’s applying Deng’s synthesis between the strident anti-liberalism of Mao, and the historical flexibility that China’s reforms embodied. To lead the world’s workers to a new revolutionary wave, we must reject the KKE and embrace Deng. 

The globe’s working masses are already being inspired by the achievements that Deng brought to China, and they’re looking for the route towards replicating these successes. By looking at this history and theory, we’ve learned what the route is, and it’s not as simple as the dogmatic opportunists would say. The meaning of the task before us can only become clear through applying the principle Mao followed, where you have to look at history in a fluid manner in order to defeat your class enemies.

————————————————————————

If you appreciate my work, I hope you become a one-time or regular donor to my Patreon account. Like most of us, I’m feeling the economic pressures amid late-stage capitalism, and I need money to keep fighting for a new system that works for all of us. Go to my Patreon here. 

To keep this platform effective amid the censorship against dissenting voices, join my Telegram channel.

The coming AI blackouts, imperialism’s long-term plan, & the next struggle the people are tasked with

Above: Gaza’s only power plant after the Zionist occupier struck it in 2014.

The Gaza genocide should give a new sense of perspective to the Americans with a mindset of preparing for future collapse scenarios. It shows us that no matter what kinds of disasters our society is going to face, they won’t come close to the level of catastrophe that Gaza’s people have been living through for the last three years. 

No doubt the empire seeks to bring this same model of civilizational murder to more places, and this is the plan that Washington has for the next generation. The war that the imperialists are waging is about subjugating the entire globe’s working class, and no one is safe. To understand our own position in the fight against this scheme, though, we have to understand just how extreme the true worst-case scenario is.

Aside from being attacked by a nuclear weapon, there’s no situation worse than being confined to one small strip of land, then having an occupier systematically bomb your infrastructure while mass-murdering those within your community. The victims of these crimes have been rendered helpless. Gaza’s water, food, and medical supplies are controlled by a government that wants to get rid of the Palestinians, and only gives them anything because of international pressure. 

Reminding ourselves of this is critical for properly responding towards the electrical breakdowns that big tech’s AI scramble will bring upon our own communities, because Gaza shows where the primary contradiction is within our political struggle.

Gaza, Yemen, Lebanon, Iran, and the other targets of Washington’s genocidal offensive are the first victims of the global cataclysm that finance capital will manufacture in the 21st century. As this destruction reaches into the heart of the U.S. empire, it’s not exactly fitting to call this an “imperial boomerang,” because being bombed is on a level far above merely losing electricity. We will experience severe blackouts due to capital’s misuse of AI, and this will have a disastrous human impact; this impact shouldn’t be minimized, but we must see the bigger process that’s playing out. Whatever crises we next experience, this cannot distract us from the duty to defeat America’s war machine, which is the main source of worldwide catastrophes and is the greatest obstacle towards overthrowing the system behind AI collapse.

This reality is exactly what our ruling class wants us to overlook as our systems fail, and the parasites at the top of capitalist society profit from its demolition. There is an insidious mindset that’s gaining traction, called “military nihilism,” which says that it’s unavoidable for the world to be assaulted by Washington’s ever-expanding war campaigns. It tells us to passively accept living in a society that’s effectively run by the imperialist military, since if this is the natural way of things then imperialism should be embraced. 

It’s a very strategic psyop, directed at the people who’ve been cut off from opportunities and have resigned to lives as shut-ins. Logically, though, when collapse comes it’s these shut-ins who will be some of the least equipped to survive. If you have nothing, acquiescing to a system in collapse guarantees your doom. Our only hope for ending the coming dark age is to take example from the peoples who’ve been forced into resistance, and collectively fight back against the imperial death machine.

Something we must understand about this machine is that its global designs can continue as the internal collapse accelerates. Imperialist war depends on austerity for the U.S. working class, with the coming systemic breakdown being just a more advanced version of this austerity. The military nihilism psyop is so dangerous because it preemptively destroys the potential for those who’ve been disenfranchised by this system to assert themselves. Its purpose is to ensure that when collapse becomes much more pronounced, the military will take control unchallenged, as the working class won’t have built its own source of sustenance and political power.

This outcome, where the masses are brought to their knees, is something that absolutely could happen even while the masses become radicalized against the imperial state. As long as a people don’t have the means to defend themselves, the imperialists can get away with murdering them on a mass scale, and this is something that Gaza has shown them.

For military nihilism to win out, and successfully stop the masses from fighting back, our ruling class will need to sustain the present stagnation within politics. It will need to keep the people paralyzed, and react to the next crises by retreating into their own silos. There is a real danger that this will happen, and parts of America’s younger population have gravitated towards such apathy amid the Iran war’s fallout. But we have a clear idea of how to mount a counter-narrative.

The reason why military nihilism has a large potential base among “Gen Alpha” is because when you’ve been born into a depression, the incentive is to reject idealism. This generation’s concern is what will materially benefit them directly; which can be translated into working-class consciousness, but only if one is provided with a clear connection to the workers movement. 

Only if the concept of being working class is given tangible meaning. Without that clarity, it can feel like you might as well submit to the ideology of the ruling class, and embrace your role as one of those who will be sacrificed for big tech. The only answer towards a mindset like this is to induct the American masses into the same struggle which the empire’s global victims are waging. To bring them into the American front within this existential battle.

Right now, we’re facing two dangers that will accelerate every trend in our collapse: a potential super El Niño, and the drive by our rulers to bring war with China. The only reason why the Trump White House hasn’t oriented around China yet is because of Iran, and the Democrats have been the ones pushing Trump to escalate on Taiwan. They feel comfortable with doing this in part because of Gaza, which revealed the threshold for how many imperialist crimes our society will accept and how far the war on the working class can go. Even as climate destabilization reaches levels that will soon catalyze early versions of the AI blackouts, those in power don’t expect we’ll resist. We need to make this confidence backfire, and rally the masses to revolt in a way that the class enemy couldn’t have anticipated.

————————————————————————

If you appreciate my work, I hope you become a one-time or regular donor to my Patreon account. Like most of us, I’m feeling the economic pressures amid late-stage capitalism, and I need money to keep fighting for a new system that works for all of us. Go to my Patreon here. 

To keep this platform effective amid the censorship against dissenting voices, join my Telegram channel.

Weaponizing Palestine against China: the “Uyghur genocide” psyop’s use for socdem neocons

This is an excerpt from the book that I’m writing, titled “When tears can’t save them: Why the pro-Palestine movement failed to stop a holocaust, & how it can still win.”

In January 2026, after Trump had kidnapped President Maduro and before he would soon start the Iran war, “human rights” discourse actors made an inflammatory charge against China. A charge that reiterated the narrative about China committing a “genocide” against the Uyghurs inside the Xinjiang province, which these actors had made a similar claim about shortly following October 7. Both statements were published by the UN’s Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, with the UN association serving to give a sense of credibility to researchers who were profoundly biased.

The timing of these kinds of statements is never a coincidence. In this case, the timing was indicative of two goals: to escalate tensions with China, and to turn support for Palestine towards “Uyghur solidarity.” This narrative has not been refuted in the consciousness of the public, meaning it’s critical to explain why the narrative is wrong and why its propagators have a motivation to lie.

It was at the start of 2026 when U.S. foreign policy began to pivot towards China in an unprecedented way, and when the social-democratic wing of U.S. politics started being pushed towards taking an active role in this preparation for war. At the Munich Security Conference in February, when Ocasio-Cortez was asked about countering China’s efforts to retake Taiwan, her response was a long hesitation followed by a vague statement about avoiding conflict. Ocasio-Cortez wasn’t sure what position on China would be best to take, but the U.S. empire is absolutely headed for war with China. The Iran war is supposed to be a step towards aggressing against the PRC, with the Democrats only opposing this war because they want to prioritize the larger imperial project. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer made this clear when in May, he accused Trump of being too conciliatory towards China, and warned him not to “sell out” Taiwan.

This is the context in which the NGO-industrial complex tried to inflame outrage against China, and turn solidarity with Muslims into a means for advancing Washington’s geopolitical designs. We know this is what motivated the January 2026 report, and all other Uyghur persecution claims from the official “human rights” sources, because these reports are consistently not truthful. This becomes clear when one pays close attention to their rhetoric, which employs highly manipulative rhetorical techniques. For example: the January 2026 statement said that according to the researchers

“There is a persistent pattern of alleged State-imposed forced labour involving ethnic minorities across multiple provinces in China,” the experts said. “In many cases, the coercive elements are so severe that they may amount to forcible transfer and/or enslavement as a crime against humanity.”

According to the experts, forced labour in China is enabled through the State-mandated “poverty alleviation through labour transfer” programme, which coerces Uyghurs and members of other minority groups into jobs in Xinjiang and other regions. They are reportedly subjected to systematic monitoring, surveillance and exploitation, with no choice to refuse or change the work due to a pervasive fear of punishment and arbitrary detention. Xinjiang’s five-year plan (2021 to 2025) projects 13.75 million instances of labour transfers. The actual numbers have reached new heights.

Take note of the last part. Pointing to the number of labor transfers is not any kind of evidence for the accusation being made; it’s not directly connected to the subject of the report, because labor transfers are an entirely different thing from forced labor. This was only included to make the charge appear more credible. This is part of a pattern in these assertions about Xinjiang’s Uyghurs.

Such misleading techniques were also present in the report from October 2023:

The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) relied extensively on China’s own records when it published its Assessment of human rights concerns in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. 

This independent and authoritative assessment found evidence of large-scale arbitrary detention and systematic use of invasive surveillance on the basis of religion and ethnicity; severe and undue restrictions to legitimate cultural and religious practices, identity and expression, including reports of destruction of religious sites; torture, ill-treatment and sexual and gender-based violence, including forced abortion and sterilisation; enforced disappearances and family separations; and forced labour.

It says that this is all supported by China’s records, but where did the researchers get their information that supposedly showed abuses? I do not ask this to argue that an idea must be false simply because of the source behind it; if the organizations and individuals behind these abuse claims were to have actual evidence for their assertions, they would of course be correct regardless. But because they don’t have this evidence, and have only made empty assertions, in this case the sources do matter to the question of whether the claim is true.

In both the 2026 and 2023 statements, it’s clear that the OHCHR and its experts drew heavily or even exclusively from sources other than on-the-ground investigations by the researchers involved. The 2026 statement describes the experts as having “concern regarding persistent allegations of forced labor,” while the one from 2023 says the researchers largely got their information from China’s internal records (which is another way of framing unrelated data as evidence for the desired narrative). 

They didn’t get the information through going to Xinjiang and documenting evidence, or from video and photographic footage of abuses against Uyghurs (since none exists). They got it through compiling allegations made by the organizations that have led the effort at popularizing this narrative. These organizations and their spokespeople have come out to tell the “genocide” story about Xinjiang many times in the past, and this has provided the U.S. war machine’s “human rights” wing with a standard playbook for whenever the Uyghur accusation becomes opportune to repeat. 

Both of these statements copied from a series of allegations that were put forth during the early 2020s by the Worker Rights Consortium, the supposedly pro-worker organization that pressured U.S. apparel companies to leave Xinjiang. In June 2020, when the WRC announced the creation of the Organization to End Forced Labor in the Uyghur Region, the formation’s steering committee brought in numerous anti-China organizations that were directly funded by the U.S. government; in addition to Uyghur diaspora groups like the World Uyghur Congress, these orgs included entities that present themselves as allies of the workers movement, such as Anti-Slavery International and International Labor Rights Forum. 

Like the WUC, ILRF is sponsored by the CIA’s National Endowment for Democracy, while ASI is funded by the U.S. State Department and the European Commission. These are the connections that show what motivates the NGOs which have popularized the “Uyghur genocide” story.

A critical figure in the origins of Washington’s Uyghur narrative is Adrian Zenz. He was the Christian Zionist who, during Trump 2.0’s solidification of the anti-China cold war effort, helped spread the notion that China had detained millions of Uyghurs. When the time came to lobby companies into leaving China, Zenz did something that indicated he wasn’t as confident in his assertions as he claimed to be: in March 2020, he sent a letter to international labor monitoring bodies requesting that they stop doing any new audits inside Xinjiang.

The letter’s argument was that “worker interviews, which are essential to the methodology of any credible auditor or certification body, cannot generate reliable information about labor conditions.” Yet when Zenz was trying to find proof for the Uyghur genocide, his most direct research had been individual interviews. Zenz got the idea about millions of Uyghurs being detained from the Network of Chinese Human Rights Defenders, which in 2018 came out with a report that relied on interviews with only eight individuals. This was the extent of the report’s truly hard investigations. Everything else was about framing the facts to fit a predetermined conclusion, like every other one of these studies has done.

When it’s apparent how poor the foundational research behind the Uyghur narrative is, the tactics of the propaganda campaign’s participants become easier to overcome. The perceived strength of their evidence comes from how frequently they tend to cite each other, and recycle the same unfounded assertions so that their list of sources can appear to be abundant. 

Everything that they say traces back to a handful of studies which are inherently shoddy, because the anti-China agitators who’ve conducted them have actively discouraged listening to Uyghurs other than the ones who have a bias against China’s government. Zenz and his partners showed this hostility towards honest empirical investigation when they said that more interviews of Xinjiang’s Uyghurs shouldn’t take place; and we know that Zenz’ view on this represents the attitudes of the other core anti-China Uyghur researchers, because they’ve also ignored the great support for the Communist Party among the Uyghur population.

Within the narrative, it’s not important that China’s ethnic minorities have benefited from the economic explosion alongside the Han majority, or that the CPC has instituted major initiatives to raise up these minority communities. It doesn’t matter that these communities have been exempt from restrictions like the one-child policy. It doesn’t matter that preserving the traditions of Chinese civilization’s local cultures has been a core part of Chinese policy goals from the PRC’s start. Any aspect of history or present conditions that doesn’t fit the narrative is viewed as covering up a dark hidden reality.

“Certainly there are going to be differences of opinion, there are going to be problems sometimes in policy implementation,” said Professor Kenneth Hammond in 2021 about Xinjiang’s Uyghurs, “but to suggest that these things rise to the level of something that could in any way be characterized as genocide goes against not only the formal policies, but also all the practical experience that we can actually document…This is reflected in the attitudes that people have in Xinjiang. We’re not talking about what does the Chinese government tell us about the attitudes of people in Xinjiang, but even western public opinion surveys, studies like the Ash Foundation [cited here], a Harvard study of public opinion in China, which includes Xinjiang, includes Tibet, includes these areas that are sometimes problematized in western accounts, where there’s clearly overwhelming support for the central government, for the policies of that government.”

These policies include the educational projects and vocational training centers for the Uyghur people, which have given ample new opportunities to the youth in these communities—and thereby ended the Islamist terror attacks that used to regularly occur in China. Washington, and its partners in Turkey’s Uyghur Salafist radicalization network, have still been unable to reintroduce this violence to Xinjiang. All that they can do now is try to use Palestine as a cynical vehicle for advancing their goals, like Erdogan does through his false declarations of solidarity with Palestine.

To interpret the assertions that the empire’s NGO wing makes about Xinjiang, simply apply the principle that “every accusation is a confession.” This is the observation that’s become popular in relation to the state of “Israel,” and to defend the pro-Palestine cause from co-optation, we must recognize that it’s also true for the United States government. This is how one graduates from anti-Zionist consciousness to anti-imperialist consciousness. And many of the workers can be turned against the empire’s propaganda machine in this way, if they’re exposed to the reality of which class interests are behind the Uyghur narrative.

This is a propaganda campaign that’s been led by the same capitalist saboteurs who make unions hostile towards the laborers they’re supposed to represent; when the Coalition to End Forced Labor put forth testimonies before Congress in September 2020, one of the coalition's speakers was the AFL-CIO’s international director Cathy Feingold. Feingold is the former foreign policy director of the Ford Foundation, the nonprofit which assisted in CIA destabilization campaigns against Indonesia and Chile on behalf of its billionaire donors. Because of these testimonies, the U.S. business pullout from Xinjiang left much of the Uyghur workers jobless, which fits with everything we know about the figures who crafted the “forced labor” lie.

The false leaders in the working-class movement, from the labor bureaucrats to the socdem politicians, seek to portray themselves as allies of Palestine. In reality, they’re filling a critical role in a global war on the working class. A war which is most pronounced within Gaza, and will only keep intensifying unless we fight back against it.

————————————————————————

If you appreciate my work, I hope you become a one-time or regular donor to my Patreon account. Like most of us, I’m feeling the economic pressures amid late-stage capitalism, and I need money to keep fighting for a new system that works for all of us. Go to my Patreon here. 

To keep this platform effective amid the censorship against dissenting voices, join my Telegram channel.

Nazi terror, mind control programs, & the human weapons in America’s coming civil war

By the beginning of 2026, when the Justice Department released its selective series of Epstein files, our ruling class had reached a new phase in its internal conflict. Though Trump 2.0 had carried forth the new cold war during the last year, the Soros wing of U.S. capital had decided that the Trump wing needed to be combated in drastic ways. So the Democrats pushed for publishing this truncated version of the Epstein documents, which left out the vast majority of the available data while only exposing certain figures among the guilty. 

This escalation of inter-capitalist rivalry represented a moment when the imperial structure would irrevocably fissure, and the competing sides in this structure would therefore intensify their efforts to spread ultraviolent chaos.

The strategic twisting of how the Epstein report was presented, where it ensured that the pedocracy wouldn’t be threatened but that the public would be traumatized by the contents, acted to set our society up for such a future. In effect, it further normalized sexual violence and violence against children, adding to all of the ways that the Gaza genocide had already done so. 

Since the files came out, the Trump wing has taken advantage of this by expanding its aggressions abroad; which it planned to do anyway, but the files have served as both an additional pressure point and as a test for how much the Trump White House can get away with. This is how the elites act when a society has been desensitized to the crimes of its rulers.

The Soros wing’s next designs for the post-Epstein era are more long-term, but when this wing does hit back, it will involve a kind of warfare that’s highly stochastic. That comes from manipulating individuals into carrying out violent acts; acts that are seemingly random, but that advance a factional battle between the elites. It’s a project to bring Epstein behaviors into the general population, and recruit ordinary individuals into carrying out human sacrifice.

The methods behind these operations will need to be explored here in some detail, because they show us how to detect the warning signs for this kind of psychological manipulation. The most important thing to know about these psyops, though, is that at this point they’ve been integrated into widespread political subcultures, ones that range across the ideological spectrum. 

In modern times, the main way that people get exposed to MKultra-type psyops is online platforms, with a famous example of this being the Epstein circle’s project to spread pro-Nazi sentiments across 4Chan. Peter Girnan summarizes what the proven facts are in this story:

Here is what the Epstein files document, in sequence: A convicted sex offender’s advisor assessed 4chan’s potential for manipulation as “huge.” The advisor arranged a meeting with the platform’s founder. /pol/ launched around the same time. The sex offender browsed the platform for years. Someone on the platform knew about his death before the world did. The FBI could not identify who. The phone company said it doesn’t keep those records. His associate possibly moderated the world’s largest news subreddit for fourteen years, then stopped the day she was arrested. His political collaborator on the right weaponized the platform’s culture to elect a president. His financial collaborator discussed the return to tribalism as an investment thesis. His collaborators on the left laundered his reputation through philanthropy, tech dinners, and a university that tagged his donations as “anonymous.” Together, they planned to fund it all with cryptocurrency. None of this is speculation. All of it is documented. The emails exist. The timestamps match. The money moved.

This operation formed the 2010s far-right online culture that would act as an influence to numerous mass shooters. The cultural image of the “Nazi incel shooter” came from this project to reintroduce Hitlerism to the discourse, and bombard the minds of the targets with anti-social ultraviolence.

The fact that the “alt right pipeline” was the product of a psyop, and the violence that came from it was fundamentally engineered, proves the extent to which discourse in general is managed. There are equivalent manipulations being conducted from every other ideological angle in addition to the right, as it’s been necessary for our ruling class to put this much effort into psyops during the social media age. And from the liberal wing of the elites, right now these efforts are being turned towards creating a fusion between “alt right” and socially progressive ideas. This synthesis is called American Azovism, because it’s a domestic application of the ruling ideology within  Ukraine.

Since the 2014 U.S. coup, Ukraine’s regime has been able to distract from its extensive support for Nazi paramilitaries and pro-Nazi views by embracing a woke PR strategy. According to the western narrative, Ukraine is the side of progress, resisting the “fascist” Russia. This has successfully separated the left from anti-imperialism during the age of the LGBT movement, making it so that having socially progressive beliefs is seen as completely compatible with supporting imperialism. 

If this is the “normie” position, then what kinds of ideas can someone be brought to when they’ve been exposed to the most extreme kinds of psychological tactics? When they’ve been subjected to a socially progressive equivalent of the Epstein Hitlerite psyop?

One scenario of this kind was when Ryan Wesley Routh, an American volunteer in the Ukraine war, tried to assassinate President Trump in September 2024. But Routh is only one among innumerable different archetypes of these human weapons. The overwhelming majority of the individuals within this world are not middle-aged true believers in the Atlanticist ideology, like Routh is. 

In the post-Covid era, the base for primed killers is the millions of socially isolated young people who were born into an economic crisis, and who now have desperately scarce life prospects. They’re the ones who are compatible with “post-irony,” where you pseudo-satirically promote an idea or behavior while actually putting it into practice. Post-irony was the tactic that Epstein’s 4Chan psyop employed, and it’s been refined to bring in a generation that increasingly has nothing to lose.

————————————————

As this online culture has developed, one phenomenon that’s come out of it is when chan users announce that they’re trans as part of the incel “transmaxxing” meme. This combination of Nazi thinking with LGBT-related post-irony was what shaped Robin Westman, the regretful transitioner who committed the Minneapolis Catholic school shooting. Even though the Soros wing of our ruling class is no longer promoting identity politics to the extent that it used to, there is still a role for social progressivism: to serve as a tool for weaponizing human beings.

This is not to say that we’re in an “epidemic of trans shooters,” like the right-wing sensationalist statement goes; and we have yet to see how many more shooters with Westman’s background will appear as these operations ramp up. What’s already happened, though, is that these psyops have successfully combined extreme wokeness with Hitlerism, creating a reserve army of American Azovites.

The forces behind these operations are inevitably going to face one of Avozism’s inherent problems: the splintering of the movement’s different factions. Events in Ukraine points to these growing tensions between Ukraine’s Hitlerites, which stem from how Azov is fundamentally subordinate towards the American state:

It turns out that the Ukrainian neo-nazi scene has somewhat divided opinions on the Maniac Murder Cult. The MKU’s love for killing the homeless and beating elderly women on camera has won them official disapproval from the doyens of the ‘M8V8MENT’…Ukrainian rightwingers are actually quite worried about the MKU affair for rather interesting reasons. They fear that more and more ‘promising young men’ are choosing to set up their own, ultra-radical neo-nazi organizations. The MKU and NS/WP approach of cursing all states as equally degenerate, ‘zionist occupations’ could be more attractive than the official Azov line of supporting NATO and Zelensky, despite all their liberal warts. It may be that some don’t see how dying in a war for NATO furthers the Aryan, let alone Ukrainian agenda.

The author describes how within the Murder Cult, there is a desire to emulate the intelligence methods for programming humans to kill, showing how the rogue elements within this civil war are the ones most enthusiastic about adopting such practices. Says the article about the Cult’s “Haters Handbook” for waging race war:

These types seem to get off on the idea that they are brain-broken CIA deep agents. There’s a whole section in the Haters Handbook on how MKU followers should use ‘FBI manipulation techniques…It also actively recommends ‘MK-ULTRAing’ oneself through psychoactive mushrooms and gore: “You can also use it for not meditation but to put your mind on aggression just like MK-ULTRA, under affect keep watching gore, agony and suffering. Another similar drug which cannot be called medicine at all is Datura, which are also called Devils Trumpets.” 

In a sense, what they’re proposing is a core part of any young person’s life growing up nowadays. MKU is a product of the times. And though MKU may now be dead, its message lives on. Like ISIS (more on which soon), it is also revived simply by any deranged violent youths describing themselves as ‘MKU’. 764, for instance, is a western-based child abuse network highly influenced by the MKU. 764 remains active to this day, and its members are responsible for a large number of vile actions against children. It is even more decentralized than the MKU, and its members even seem to describe themselves as both adepts of both 764 and the MKU.

This is the trajectory of the imperial power structure as a whole: divisions keep appearing, then the breakaway factions re-create the original authority’s warfare tactics with unencumbered abandon. This chaos can certainly be useful to the power structure, but every time the empire cultivates these forces, it introduces wild card players that can’t be kept under command. 

The best way to contain this risk is by keeping the fingers of the intelligence apparatus inside as many of these renegade currents as possible. This explains the posture that the psyop machine has now taken towards extreme wokeism, where forces like the LGBT movement are no longer pushed to the forefront of the discourse but are still used to influence niche political spaces. Inevitably this would translate to psyops like the trans/Hitlerite chan culture merge, because unstable conditions lead the elites to turn towards such outlandish plans. The counterinsurgency strategists are trying to maintain control in an environment where those at the very top have begun turning on each other, and it’s uncertain how many of their peers will stay with them during America’s next crisis moments.

We’re seeing the same unraveling occur in the Zionist state, whose different wings are engaged in an escalating conflict that the Palestinian resistance can exploit. From the USA to Ukraine to “Israel,” the reactionary forces are increasingly at loggerheads, reacting to the 21st century’s crises by attacking each other. This means that our ruling class and its auxiliaries do not have a cohesive strategy for waging war against the people; the factions have wildly different goals, and will struggle to unify against the people as our class conflict intensifies. 

The question is not whether the ruling class will be able to stop a collapse of the system. The question is whether we’ll be able to unify the masses amid the inter-elite civil war, which the opposing elite factions will try to bring the masses into. 

————————————————

Part of why we can expect these kinds of mind control operations to intensify is because at this point in American history, the masses have become far more unified than they’ve been in a long time. Their government’s consistent betrayals of them after the crises of 2020, and the new wars that our leaders have entered into during this time, are such overwhelming problems that the culture war battles no longer compel most people. For a long time, starting in the Reagan era and ending with the 2020s, what Michael Parenti called the “culture struggle” was exceptionally effective at keeping Americans divided. But now that this tactic has lost its power, our ruling class is increasing its use of other historic methods for pacifying the people. Methods that rely on fear and demoralization.

In 1985, it was discovered that former marines Leonard Lake and Charles Ng had set up a bunker where they’d imprisoned, tortured, and murdered potentially dozens of victims. They were among the large list of other serial murderers throughout the 20th century who had suspicious connections to covert operations, and the acts that they committed were fitting for a political moment which was defined by authoritarian appeals towards protecting the American family.

In addition to their psycho-sexual project of enslaving young women, they would kidnap entire families, entering the homes of parents under false pretenses and then forcing all of the household’s members to come with them. Their targets were in the San Francisco Bay Area, the “spawning ground” for Vietnam War-era serial killers, and their torture compound was just north of the cult hotspot Ukiah.

Like is so often the case for these killers, the ways in which the perpetrators became the types of people who would commit such crimes was a combination of mind control and regular ideological radicalization. Lake was a true 39-year-old incel who believed he had no romantic prospects, and who wanted to realize his long-held fantasy of having a sexual slave. Ng had been stationed in Hawaii, a prominent location for military mind control operations, prior to when he was arrested for stealing weapons and then escaped prison. The two became connected through the California survivalist movement, whose infamously white supremacist-adjacent magazine Soldiers of Fortune provided them with an advertised network for forming wilderness camps.

When they embarked on their sadistic project, they were embodying the ethos of the “Ninja Soldiers of Fortune,” with the goal of a “Ninja” being to take lives for the sake of pure libidinal satisfaction. This movement successfully continued the legacy of Otto Skorzeny, the Nazi commander who became a “soldier of fortune” mercenary after World War II. And all throughout the time that this movement was allowed to proliferate, the U.S. had been waging the Cold War with the assistance of Third Reich scientists, as well as the Reich military officials who’d assumed positions inside NATO. At the point when Lake and Ng began their activities in 1981, the Reagan White House was working to keep the Nazi imports inside the United States.

The mind control operations that produced these serial killer cases, most famously embodied in Washington’s “Phoenix Program” for murdering and dismembering Vietnamese civilians, can be traced to the Third Reich. The practice developed by Reich scientists was to desensitize recruits into killing not just human beings who they'd dehumanized, but their fellow Aryans, as this would fully acclimate them to taking lives.

It is this desensitization aspect of mind control that helps explain the popularity of graphic content across chan boards, which have been used to funnel their visitors towards gore sites where terrorist groups show off their exploits and attract new members. This material is not just about networking within these organizations, it’s about conditioning future participants.

The nature of the empire’s warfare methods is anti-human, and is quite literally Satanic given how deeply occult rituals were woven into the crimes that Epstein’s clients committed. These methods also produce unavoidable blowback, and they represent the desperation of a regime that’s increasingly in disarray. When the competing wings of capital next confront each other over who has claim to the presidency, and the country undergoes a constitutional crisis, the players in this conflict will no doubt deploy many new human weapons—both against each other and against the people. 

If the agents of imperialism are going to expand their wars to everywhere, including their own homes, then it would seem to logically follow that the power structure can’t hold. Indeed it can’t. What’s to be determined is how long it will take for the people to replace this structure with one that they themselves control, and clear away the renegade terror forces that the collapse leaves behind.

————————————————————————

If you appreciate my work, I hope you become a one-time or regular donor to my Patreon account. Like most of us, I’m feeling the economic pressures amid late-stage capitalism, and I need money to keep fighting for a new system that works for all of us. Go to my Patreon here. 

To keep this platform effective amid the censorship against dissenting voices, join my Telegram channel.