There’s a real danger that the Cornell rapes will be exploited by our ruling class to manufacture a new era of gender war divisions. And the main facilitators of these divisions are the performative males—the kinds of leftist men who virtue-signal to other men, and show how hard they support liberal misandry. We must demolish their hypocritical project, and stop Cornell from becoming the catalyst for a gender war scenario like the one that south Korea has experienced. This will let us take the present moment in the right direction, where Cornell galvanizes the mass movement against Epsteinite abuse.
South Korea’s ruling class decided to exploit its own country’s sexual assaults, and fuel enormous animosity between the sexes, because it realized that this is how to manage a society in terminal demographic and social collapse. There’s no way the government will be able to stop population crash merely through pro-family bonuses or reforms; the worldwide drop in birthrates comes from fundamental economic and social changes, ones that have made family formation go way down even in socialist countries like China.
Whereas China’s communist party has an incentive to respond to these contradictions with rational planning, south Korea and the other reactionary states will respond by instigating destructive cultural battles. It’s how capital can preempt the resurgence of the global workers movement. Those who rule the world would rather have every country become like Nigeria, where a mass of sexless men have joined Boko Haram, than let the working masses unify. This is the endgame of the gender war psyops that we’re seeing the algorithms boost.
These male leftists are playing such a dangerous role because their message can only worsen every aspect of these gender relations problems, at a moment when the masses are already deeply demoralized. There are many people who don’t want to participate in these cultural fights, but the minority who do want to inflame the divisions will get the biggest platforms. Part of the problem is the “pink pill” types of misandrists who create viral content feeding other women’s resentments; but the performative males represent a different issue. What they’re doing is replacing Andrew Tate and Clavicular, who the system has now discarded as discourse tools, with deeply paranoid propaganda about how men should be viewed.
It’s part of a larger cultural shift where people have been reacting to Trump 2.0 by embracing moralistic thinking. Of course the narrative managers would use this trend to promote the worst kinds of virtue-signalling; they don’t want the swing back towards wokeness to mean the rise of a real left-wing politics, they want it to mean an even more corrupted version of MeToo.
Because the original MeToo took place amid the Democratic Party’s anti-Trump “resistance” campaign, where the establishment was using social justice to push reactionary psyops like Russiagate, the ruling class could actually twist this effort to combat sexual assault into something that strengthened our abusive structures. This was largely the work of the social media platforms, which created an incentive to make both misandrist content and misogynistic content.
When the conversation became diverted towards a gender fight, this protected the class system that lets monsters get away with what they do. Reframing sexual assault as a men vs. women issue distracts from the ways that institutions like universities cultivate assault. These fraternity men wouldn’t have access to their victims if not for the system of coercion that’s run by both frats and sororities. The more the discourse on this abuse gets manipulated by the gender warriors, the safer of a position the abusers are in.
Another effect this psyop has is to decrease the levels of trust in our society, with surveillance being a core part of why people have become more on-guard. There’s now a widespread fear among men that they’re going to become targets of social media backlash if they let this guard down in public; it’s an exacerbating factor in why so many of them have chosen to isolate themselves, and become more like Japan’s hikikomori shut-ins. (Sure enough, fear of getting ostracized as a predator is also a factor behind why so many Japanese men have lost interest in relationships entirely.) Because why would you trust people in a society that’s shown it sees you as inherently suspect?
Pointing out these kinds of problems is a great way to identify who exactly these performative males are, because they’re usually the first ones to shout down any discussions about men’s issues or any real pushback against gender war brainrot. These types are the other side of the coin to the Tate grifters, because they’re often predators themselves; Louis CK, who did a bit on how men are the #1 threat to women, is the ultimate example of this compensatory behavior among many closeted abusers.
This is such an inevitable kind of hypocrisy among “male feminists” that Lenin wrote about it; he pointed out how moral outrage against exploitation of women is as a rule hypocritical in bourgeois discourse:
Present-day capitalist society conceals within itself numerous cases of poverty and oppression which do not immediately strike the eye. At the best of times, the scattered families of poor townspeople, artisans, workers, employees and petty officials live in incredible difficulties, barely managing to make both ends meet. Millions upon millions of women in such families live (or, rather, exist) as “domestic slaves”, striving to feed and clothe their family on pennies, at the cost of desperate daily effort and “saving” on everything—except their own labour.
It is these women that the capitalists most willingly employ as home-workers, who are prepared for a monstrously low wage to “earn a little extra” for themselves and their family, for the sake of a crust of bread. It is from among these women, too, that the capitalists of all countries recruit for themselves (like the ancient slave-owners and the medieval feudal lords) any number of concubines at a most “reasonable” price. And no amount of “moral indignation” (hypocritical in 99 cases out of 100) about prostitution can do anything against this trade in female flesh; so long as wage-slavery exists, inevitably prostitution too will exist. All the oppressed and exploited classes throughout the history of human societies have always been forced (and it is in this that their exploitation consists) to give up to their oppressors, first, their unpaid labour and, second, their women as concubines for the “masters”.
Since Lenin wrote this, bourgeois society has superficially moved to a more evolved stage on the role of women, putting women into many more parts of the workforce. Yet as soon as the system entered its next big downturn, we saw a new rise of prostitution, now with the ruling class ready to commodify sex on an unprecedented scale and with a new branding. This is the role of OnlyFans: to sell the world’s oldest exploitation model as something empowering. Solving the global rift between the sexes will require the working class to gain power, as well as resolve the gargantuan modern social problems that even China has yet to overcome. But something we can do now is expose these performative males who are taking advantage of Epsteinite abuses to push their narcissistic agenda. We know what class role they serve, we know their tactics; let’s take away their ability to poison the discourse.
————————————————————————
If you appreciate my work, I hope you become a one-time or regular donor to my Patreon account. Like most of us, I’m feeling the economic pressures from our era of accelerating inflation, and I need money to keep fighting for a new system that works for all of us. Go to my Patreon here.
To keep this platform effective amid the censorship against dissenting voices, join my Telegram channel.